Misc. Iraq Postings 5
- Subject: "Three Baskets" Voices in the Wilderness update
Date: Sun, 11 Mar 2001 16:21:46 -0800
From: Kathy Kelly
Analysis of Secty St Powell's proposals re Iraq and suggestions for
action.
Forwarded by Carolyn Scarr
===========================
"Three baskets"
Dear Friends,
For several years, VitW (Voices in the Wilderness) members have enacted
a simple skit in which a woman dressed in black stands before an audience
olding an empty basket. Two
readers alternate reading UN statements about conditions in Iraq under
sanctions. As each statement is read, an audience member walks forward,
picks up a brick, and places it in the basket. When the sixth brick is
added to her load, she falls to the ground, with a piercing cry.
Last week, Secretary of State Colin Powell proposed "three baskets" to
designate plans for future US relations with Iraq. We welcome Mr.
Powell's
readiness to heed the alarmed concerns for Iraqi people voiced by Arab
leaders with whom he recently met. However, we must immediately
challenge
him to recognize that each basket he proposes amounts to a ton of bricks
heaped upon Iraqi civilians whose cries of anguish have been muted by US
State Department strategies. (See the end of this letter for suggested
campaign actions).
Aiming to reassess an Iraq policy which he said "was falling apart,"
Secretary Powell suggested new policy would come in "three baskets":
Sanctions, No-Fly Zones, and "Regime Change." Our sum-up of the basket
contents is deprivation (sanctions), violence (ongoing bombardment) and
covert action (regime change.)
Be warned: Secretary Powell's vision for the future of US Iraq policy
holds
no apology for the suffering and destruction caused by the sanctions; we
don't
detect special attention directed to humanitarian and economic concerns
of
Iraqi
people. But this simply means we must work harder to continue developing
analysis, education, and action!
Basket One: Sanctions.
Secretary Powell is desperate to resucitate the dying sanctions regime
and
bring "the coalition" back together. He has begun by bringing back to
life
dying myths about Iraq and US policy. In a salute to his predecessor,
Madeleine Albright, Mr. Powell boldly told the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee on Thursday that "(Saddam Hussein) is hurting the Iraqi
people,
not us. There is more than enough money available to the regime now to
take
care of the needs they have." In fact, all of the money Iraq earns
through
the UN oil-for-food program goes into an escrow account controlled by
the UN
Security Council. Some of the surplus funds in this account are the
result of logjams created by Security Council refusal to approve certain
contracts.
It's no surprise to learn that huge profits are derived from smuggling
and
black market profiteering when sanctions create intense desperation for
needed goods. We should be scandalized whenever any government fails to
spend its revenues on meeting human needs. However, whatever hard
currency
the Iraqi government has accrued through the illegal smuggling of oil
and
other goods, even if applied to infrastructure repair and other societal
needs,
could not begin to pay the estimated 100 billion dollars needed to
rehabilitate
Iraq's shattered economy. Large scale investments of public and private
monies
are needed to repair the electrical facilities which are necessary for
water
treatment. The agricultural, health care, education, and industrial
development
sectors need massive financial investments.
Mr. Powell says he hopes to "change the nature of the debate." He is
deeply
concerned that "We are being accused and we are taking on the burden of
hurting Iraqi people, hurting Iraqi children." A logical first step for
the
Secretary of State would be to take a meaningful look at the facts
behind
the accusations, thoroughly documented by UN coordinators on the ground
in
Iraq. Mr. Powell could seek the interpretation and advice of former UN
Humanitarian Coordinators in Iraq, Mr. Denis Halliday and Mr. Hans von
Sponeck, who have laid out very specific and informed alternatives to
the
deprivation and violence of the current policy. Unfortunately, Mr.
Powell's
current vision seems limited to what appears to be intensified
propaganda to
obscure the overwhelming evidence of U.S. culpability in the ongoing
humanitarian disaster in Iraq.
Basket Two: No-Fly Zones
In his testimony, Mr. Powell used the basket breakdown to isolate U.N.
policy (sanctions) from U.S. policy (No-Fly Zones and Regime Change).
Previously, no pro-sanctions politician and few journalists have made
this
distinction. The No-Fly Zones violate international law and are not
mandated by any U.N. Resolution. Weekly bombings in the North and South
of
Iraq by U.S. and British planes have regularly missed their targets,
wounding and killing civilians and destroying homes, flocks, and
businesses.
Mr. Powell clarified that the new administration is reviewing the
policy,
but he also wanted the Iraqi regime to understand that "we reserve the
right
to strike militarily any activity out there, any facility we find that
is
inconsistent with their obligations to get rid of weapons of mass
destruction." If the recent bombing on the outskirts of Baghdad is any
indication, this means we can anticipate many more guided missiles and
illegal cluster bombs missing their mark and further terrorizing the
Iraqi
people. It appears that the new administration has decided to
substitute
bombs for weapons inspectors.
Basket Three: Regime Change
The third major basket, "regime change" carries on a supposed objective
of
the Clinton administration. Mr. Powell has released more funds to the
Iraqi
National Congress, an opposition group that claims it can pose a
challenge
to Iraq's government. "Hopefully," said Mr. Powell, "we will see a
regime
change that will be better for the world." The U.S. could begin
creating
conditions within the Middle East that are better for the world by
ending
its weapon sales to every country in the region. Should the U.S. want
to
help Iraq move toward more democratic governing structures, it should
help
Iraq strengthen its education, communication, and social service
systems,
and help Iraqis to build a strong and well educated middle class.
------------
What you can do:
1. Call your congressperson and ask that he or she support the
Humanitarian
Exports Leading to Peace Act (HR 742 - the H.E.L.P. ACT) introduced by
Representative Conyers. Consult EPIC's website,
www.saveageneration.org
for information about the bill (go to the
Talking Points section of the website and then to Epic Briefs--Epic
refers
to the bill as HR 3825 on their website, but the bill has been
reintroduced
with a new number HR 742.) This bill holds real promise and deserves
vigorous support.
2. Help us gain signers for a sign-on letter that will be distributed
to
faith-based, humanitarian, and human rights groups, calling on President
Bush to terminate the sanctions and help facilitate the capital
investment
required to enable the Government of Iraq to rebuild its infrastructure.
The
letter is posted on our website at www.nonviolence.org/vitw.
President Bush has said he wants to work with faith based groups. Let
us
make sure he hears from hundreds of faith based groups regarding their
belief that the sanctions must end. We’re blest with a group of
students
who are spending their spring break with us, poised and ready to contact
faith based groups and seek their signatures to this letter. Please let
us
know, (soon!) if you or your group are prepared to sign on to this
letter
and if you have any contacts with whom you think we should be in touch.
All good wishes from all of us on Carmen Avenue.
Sincerely,
Lauren Cannon, Jeff Guntzel, Laurie Hasbrook, Tom Jackson, Kathy Kelly,
and
Danny Muller
p.s. Tom Walsh found the job of his dreams and is working through Loyola
U.
for economic justice as regards housing opportunities in Chicago. We
miss
him as much as we thank him.
- Subject: Sec. of State Colin Powell's visit to the ME
Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2001 19:45:01 -0600
From: Kathy Kelly
Dear Friends,
As Secretary of State Colin Powell approaches the Bush administration to
suggest an easing of economic sanctions against Iraq, let us pressure
elected reps and media contacts to emphasize the need for massive
investments of funds, equipment and expertise to help Iraq rebuild its
infrastructure and re-establish fair trade in a post-embargo period.
Please visit our website and read comments of Mr. Denis Halliday and Mr.
Hans von Sponeck, both former UN coordinators of humanitarian programs in
Iraq. Use their comments to develop talking points regarding alternatives
to sanctions. There you can also find a sketch of details regarding
rehabilitation of Iraq’s infrastructure, specifically as regards electric
power production, potable water, sanitation, health care, agriculture and
education. It’s important to emphasize that cosmetic changes in the current
sanctions regime won’t enable Iraq to overcome the deadly impact of the past
decade’s economic warfare and bombardment.
Call or write your congressperson and Senator to urge briefings on Capitol
Hill by experts who have experience ‘on the ground’ with UN programs in
Iraq.
Ask your local media to carefully scrutinize Mr. Powell’s recommendations, as
they develop, and examine how these proposals could realistically meet the
humanitarian needs of Iraqi people.
Ask your elected representatives and local media to carefully consider
recent UN documentation of contracts for items requested by the Government
of Iraq and put on hold during Phase VII of the "oil for food" deal. We’ll
post the listing on our website, but let us know if you’d like it faxed to
you immediately. A majority of the items are medicines, medical equipment,
medical machines and medical appliances.
Insist that Iraqi people shouldn’t be reduced to living in a welfare state,
reliant on handouts. Let Mr. Powell know that we advocate peaceful
relations with Iraq, an end to US airstrikes and use of cluster bombs
(cluster bombs don’t destroy radar stations!), a lifting of the sanctions
against Iraq and an embargo on military sales to the entire region.
Thanks in advance for making these contacts:
US Sec. of State Colin Powell
US Department of State
2202 C Street NW
Washington, DC 20520
Tel. 202-647-4000
Fax: 202-261-8577 |
|
President George Bush
the White House
1600 Pennsylvania Avenue NW
Washington, DC 205000
202-456-2580 |
The Honorable (full name)
US House of Representatives
Washington, DC 20515 |
|
Senator (full name)
United States Senate
Washington, DC 20510 |
<><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><><>
That link is Voices in the Wilderness
The letter referred to follows below.
Voices
in the Wilderness
A
Campaign to End the Economic Sanctions Against the
People of Iraq
Questions and Answers: II. Regarding
Alternatives to Sanctions and Suggested
Post-Embargo Plans
Regarding the contention that those who oppose sanctions offer no
alternative,
we quote from a letter of Denis Halliday, UN Humanitarian Coordinator
for Iraq 1997-98 and HC von Sponeck, Humanitarian Coordinator
1998-2000 printed in The Guardian, Jan 8,
2001:
Both of us,
for example, have said time and again that the UN security council
should delink economic sanctions from the disarmament debate while
imposing arms controls on Iraq and those countries which wish to sell
arms to Baghdad, keeping in mind resolution 687,
paragraph 14, which calls for the establishment in the Middle East of
a zone free of weapons of mass destruction.
We have argued that the hidden agenda of hardline geo-strategic
interests be dropped
and a dialogue be started;
Regarding the post-embargo
rebuilding of Iraq, below are recommendations listed by Mr. Denis Halliday February 13 2000
The member states of the UN Security Council must immediately
TERMINATE THE ECONOMIC EMBARGO. The strangle-hold of the
Sanctions Committee must end. The economy must be free of UN
interference and be urgently rebuilt. The health and
agriculture sectors must be revitalised. The highest levels
of education need to be
reestablished. Men and women must be able to earn a decent
living again. Employment opportunities need to
be created. Income levels need to be restored.
Inflation needs to be stopped and the dinar
strengthened. Consumer goods, food processing and other forms
of manufacturing must be
reestablished. In summary, the whole economic and social
spectrum needs to be addressed in depth and with speed.
a. The AGRICULTURE SECTOR will require special focus so
that never again will Iraq be vulnerable to importation of basic
foodstuffs. Food security in the future must be a
top priority.
Irrigated systems will need investment.
New land will need to be opened and
sustained. Farmers will need subsidies and support. Good water
management will be critical,
particularly in the context of endangered levels of water in the Tigris
and the Euphrates. Reservoirs and water
catchment areas will need to be further developed. It would appear
to me that greater
self-sufficiency in all
aspects of agricultural production from pesticides to fertilizers,
from cereals to
animal husbandry would serve the best interests of
Iraq. The over dependency on oil exports and
massive importation of foodstuffs creates a vulnerability to be avoided
in the future. Heavy capital
investment would
appear to be essential.
b. The HEALTH SECTOR likewise requires huge capital outlay to restore
rural clinics and
urban
hospitals throughout the country. People all over the country
need to have their
confidence
restored in the public health care system in order to bring control over
epidemics, water
borne disease, anemia and malnutrition.
c. The WATER SECTOR requires the rebuilding of treatment and
distribution systems
throughout the country. Without this restoration, unacceptable
high child mortality is likely
to continue. The reestablishment and expansion of urban sanitation
systems is equally important.
d. The quality of EDUCATION needs to be restored primary,
secondary and
tertiary. Teachers and professors need to be returned to their
students. Class rooms, laboratories and space
for computer science will
need attention. Much capital investment will be needed.
Iraqi investment in
people, and the future, will need to be revitalised. The
intellectual embargo must
be terminated. Overseas studies will need to be facilitated once
again.
e. Perhaps above all other reconstruction prerequisites, is the need to
restore the
capacity of Iraq to produce and distribute ELECTRIC POWER through its
once effective national grid. Agriculture, health care, water and
sanitation are all greatly dependent on the availability of cheap
electric power.
f. INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT is fundamental to an economy that will be
part of the global economy, but will want to remain free and independent
of its greed, its exploitation of
cheap labour and its pressures leading to environmental negligence.
Iraq will need to participate
while at the same
time protecting its integrity from the corruption and dangers of
superficial
opportunities.
g. And we cannot overlook the ENVIRONMENT, in particular the damage
caused by the Gulf
War together with ten long years of UN embargo, minimal protection and
maintenance during this
period. Investment will be required to clean up waters such as
the Shatt al Arab, the Tigris, the
Euphrates and
offshore areas of the Gulf.
h. Likewise, we cannot forget DEPLETED URANIUM, used during the Gulf
War by UN allies,
and remaining toxic even today in the debris of war, in the soil, and
in the water of the
South. Depleted Uranium DU residue is going to demand
special international scientific
attention. A truly independent
enquiry into usage by the US and the UK during the Gulf War must be
undertaken. The
world must understand the crimes committed, but even more importantly,
the global medical profession
must assist with combating current and
long term effects. The human damage is already apparent,
now a way must be found to guard against yet more damage, more
lost lives, in the future.
We have seen horrific increase in cancers throughout child and adult
hospitals, and in
particular the increases in Basra and the southern parts of the
country. We have seen the horror of
birth defects, and the evidence of medical complications never before
seen in this country. The use
of DU when it impacts on civilians constitutes a crime against
humanity; a crime for which Britain and
the USA will have to answer. When Iraq is ready, and in addition
to prosecution, the issue of
compensation for lives destroyed and families maimed should be pursued
by the United Nations
i. BANKING, INTERNET LINKS and the TELECOMMUNICATIONS and
TRANSPORTATION SECTORS will need to be rebuilt, improved and expanded.
A modern economy must be driven forward designed to raise the
well being of all Iraqis, both
urban and rural. Small towns and villages will need to keep apace
with Baghdad and other cities. FULL
EMPLOYMENT and effective INCOME DISTRIBUTION during the difficult
years of economic recovery, and then during success and prosperity,
will need to be managed well. Investment
and focus on RURAL areas will be needed to avoid urban drift.
j. From my experience working in Iraq, I believe that the expertise
to meet all these
demands resides amongst the ministers and technocrats of government departments. However,
there is also an important human resource overseas. I refer to
the hundreds of thousands of Iraqi
Professionals
Overseas who fled the embargo in order to take care of their
families. I have met
such Iraqis in Australia, in Canada, in Ireland and elsewhere. And
I know that they are highly
regarded overseas, but I believe that most would like to go home to
rejoin their extended families. And
to play a part in
the recovery of the Iraqi economy.
How is all of this to be accomplished? I have mentioned the need
for both
recurring expenditures and capital investment. Recurring Budgetary
costs of the country will presumably
have to be met from oil export revenues, maximized when spare parts and
equipment for new wells become
available.
Debt relief will need to be sought from those countries supportive
of Iraqi
recovery. When Iraqi is ready, OPEC should be urged to approve, as
an exceptional measure, an increase in Iraqs
global export-share in recognition of urgent needs and in acknowledgment
of ten years of lost
revenue.
Apart from recurring expenditures, it seems clear that massive CAPITAL
INVESTMENT will
be needed. I assume those in government planning
have such investment needs calculated,
but it would appear to be in excess of US $100 billion. And it needs
to be available immediately
the embargo is removed, if not before, in order to expand oil production,
rebuild and enhance electric
power and distribution capacity, water treatment and distribution
systems. Urban
sanitation needs and the restoration of agricultural irrigation systems,
animal health and production will be
required.
Likewise, capital investment will be needed for health care, education,
agriculture,
telecommunications, transportation and urban and rural
reconstruction.
2. But first, the US and the UK must end their illegal NO-FLY
ZONE bombing
attacks on the north and south of Iraq. There is no UN provision,
including Resolution 688, calling
for the continuous bombing of Iraq. It has resulted in the death
of hundreds of
civilians. It terrorizes the children of the country. It
constitutes war and it must stop. I understand in
Washington and within the US Air Force, there are many reservations
about the no-fly zone bombing policy. Certainly, all the members of
the Security Council, but for the UK and the US, have condemned it.
3. Although it is an Iraqi domestic issue, and a sensitive one, I
want to remind
listeners of the need to accelerate peaceful reunification with the
northern governorates. Despite the fact
that the Kurds as an ethnic group have been used and betrayed since the
fall of the Ottoman Empire by the
British, the Iranians, and more recently the USA, there remains European
Community and international
concern for their well being. I mention this concern, knowing full
well that the Kurds of
Iraq have also suffered
terribly under the economic embargo maintained by these same countries.
They appear to be
unaware of the loss of life and malnutrition amongst Kurdish children,
and adults, due to the
embargo for which they are responsible.
Despite all the difficulties of the past, I believe that the Kurds
of the northern
governorates need to be treated with tolerance. Baghdad needs to
continue to respond to their economic and
other needs, as the UN embargo crumbles and Iraq continues to expand its
international dialouge. This would be consistent with the present
commitment of Baghdad to the social, linguistic, educational
and cultural rights of Iraqi Kurds.
4. The fear of WEAPONS OF MASS DESTRUCTION, including chemical and
biological,
continues. Today, Iraq is surrounded by countries heavily armed
with modern conventional weapons, and
some with weapons of mass destruction. Despite the statements of former
disarmament inspector
Mr. Scott Ritter that Iraq has no such WMD weapons capacity, the politics
of the US-driven Security
Council appear to require the certainty of that condition. Despite
the double standards of
the Council in respect to disarmament within the Region, the need for
certainty needs to be dealt with by
Iraq in order to hasten the lifting of the embargo. And I
say this, despite legitimate
concerns about Iraqi national sovereignty, the right to man its borders
and its apparent defensive vulnerability today.
After ten long years, Resolution 1284 and its possibility of suspending
the embargo is
moot. Monitoring can be carried out under existing non-proliferation
treaty provisions by the
IAEA and other international bodies as appropriate. This should be
conditional on the
implementation of paragraph 14 of Resolution 687 which calls for the removal
of weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear, from all countries of
the Region. However, let us hope that the
Security Council and the European Community, will begin to end the
application of double standards on this
matter, and begin to take nuclear and other disarmament decisions
compatible with the UN charter and
international law.
5. It is clearly in the best interests of good relations that Iraq
continue to reassure
the people of Kuwait of its good intentions.
Likewise, Kuwait must stop US bombers using it as a base
from which to attack and kill innocent Iraqis. The Turks and
the Saudis must do likewise. In
this connection, Iraq will want to continue searching for the missing 605
Kuwaiti people, much as Kuwait must search
for the 1040 missing Iraqis.
It is encouraging to see the ever growing dialouge and cooperation
between Iraq and
neighbours such as Saudi Arabia, the Gulf States, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey
and Iran.
6. There must be an immediate suspension by the UN of Compensation Payments,
using
oil-for food revenues, in respect of all claimants as long as a single
Iraqi child, or adult dies
unnecessarily. And then the entire compensation issue needs an
independent international examination in order to
address, inter alia, legal applications, the use of double standards by
the Security Council in
regard to the compensation that other states in the Region might
be expected to pay.
[Voices in the Wilderness]
Voices in the Wilderness
A Campaign to End the Economic Sanctions Against thePeople of Iraq
Maintained by Chuck Quilty, cquilty@juno.com
Page created February 18, 2001, Chuck Quilty, VITW
- Subject: Background to the No-Fly Zones
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:46:37 -0800
From: Betty Molchany
Forwarded by Carolyn Scarr-----
A very interesting article which sheds some light on the history of the
establishment of the No-Fly Zones.
========================
I believe that it would be important to comment on UN Security Council
Resolution 688 which is the base for those No-Fly Zones according to the
US and the UK.
First of all, resolution 688 was adopted upon protests by Turkey and
Iran of the large number of refuges entering their territories after the
military operations. This surge of refuge- seekers already started as a
result of allied bombing activities which did not spare the north of
Iraq. As an example, the Zakho bridge linking Iraq to Turkey was bombed
early on in the military actions, without anyone understanding what
bombing it has to do with the alleged objective of liberating Kuwait….
The resolution also refers to "crossborder incursions", which means that
there were also Turkish incursions inside Iraq… According to Colin
Powell in a televised interview,the US had a contingency plan to blow up
dams located in the north of Iraq to flood central Iraq, estimating
losses to be at about 1 million civilians. This does not show that the
US cared for the Human Rights of the Kurdish people….
France also sent a letter to the SC, originated by the wife of President
Mitterand, who had become a human rights activist. Of course, Mrs.
Mitterand did not think of the human rights of the Alegrians killed by
French troops when her husband was the butcher of Algeria…
Unlike all other resolutions related to Iraq, resolution 688 is NOT
based on Chapter VII of the Charter of the UN, nor on any previous
resolution related to Iraq, and its implementation does not therefore
have the automatic authorization for the use of force given by Chapter
VII. In fact this resolution is based on Article 2, paragraph 7 of the
Charter of the UN, which states:
"Nothing contained in the present Charter shall authorize the United
Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the
domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to
submit such matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this
principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures
under Chapter VII".
I believe that those Members who voted for this resolution, did so with
an understanding that it will not be enforced. But they did not realize
that the US was using the vague wording of the Charter and
Resolutions to serve its interests.
The resolution also reaffirms the commitment of all Member States to the
sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of Iraq
and of all States in the area. Preventing Iraq from flying in its
air-space, flying over Iraq, or bombing its radar facilities and
installations is a definite violation of this specific resolution and of
the Charter of the UN.
Most important, the Resolution, though politically motivated and adopted
in the peak of US control of the UN and its decision making, does not,
in any of its articles, authorize the use of force or the creation of
flight exclusion zones.
As our friend Elias Davidson wrote, Iraq is entitled to war reparations
under international law, not only for the war crimes committed during
the military activities of 1991, but also for any and all activities
committed since that date whether in the establishing of the No-Fly
Zones, or in participating and supporting US-UK aggression against Iraq.
Peace
GIS
-------------------
George Isacsson is Scandinavian. He is an Architect by profession,
holding a Ph.D., but has done extensive research and studies on Middle
East affairs, and has lived some time in some Arab countries.
- Subject: e-VOTE re recent Iraq bombing
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:45:03 -0500 (EST)
From: Betty Molchany
Forwarded by Rania Masri
please vote, and pass it on.
========================
http://www.vote.com/vote/26824687/index.phtml?cat=4075633
If you can't get this site by clicking on the above, then go to
www.vote.com and look to the right side of the page.
The heading will be Active Votes
Come down to the 5th question which is
"US and British planes strike Iraq:
Do you support the attack?"
The vote is 89% in favor of the attack.
Please while this vote is active, get there immediately and pass this
message on.
Betty
Back to the Directory