Misc. Iraq Postings
- Subject: US,UK bar testimony from foes of Iraq sanctions in UN
Date: 10/04/2000 16:22:00 ET
US, UK, bar testimony from foes of Iraq sanctions
UNITED NATIONS, Oct 4 (Reuters) - The United States and Britain this week
barred two former U.N. officials who oppose sanctions against Iraq from
testifying before a U.N. panel on guidelines to improve the use of embargoes,
according to letters circulated on Wednesday. France, an opponent of
sanctions, had requested that Hans von Sponeck and Dennis Halliday, both
coordinators of the U.N. humanitarian programme in Iraq, address a Security
Council working group studying ways to impose sanctions but spare civilians.
However, the U.S. and Britain, in separate letters to Anwarul Chowdhury,
Bangladesh"s ambassador who chairs the panel, as looking at generic sanctions
issues, not at individual sanctions regime before it recommended to the full
council ways to improve them. "It needs to focus on the tasks before it, and
avoid getting side-tracked. A briefing by Mr von Sponeck and Mr Halliday
would merely be an unhelpful distraction," the British letter said, adding
there was little time to hear even half the experts already on the
committee's list. The United States said that previous experts before the
pane have had a broad overview, generally academic. In contrast the two
former U.N. officials are "not sanctions experts and have narrow expertise in
only one regime." Von Sponeck of Germany resigned from his post in February
after strong pressure from the United States for his outspoken criticism of
the sanctions. Halliday of Ireland, his predecessor left in September 1998
after making similar criticisms and has testified before U.S. congressional
committees. The United States and Britain have tough positions on Iraq while
France as well as Russia and China are more sympathetic.
==============================
Dear ABC News / Reuters:
Your report stated: "Von Sponeck of Germany resigned from his post in
February after strong pressure from the United States for his outspoken
criticism of the sanctions."
It is not true that von Sponeck resigned due to pressure from the US, as your
report implies. Von Sponeck stayed at his post for months DESPITE strong
pressure from the U.S. After his resignation, he was asked if he had been
"forced to resign." He replied, "Yes, by my conscience."
Rev. G. Simon Harak, S. J.
============================================
Dear ABC News / Reuters:
When the US blocked the appearance of Denis Halliday and Hans von Sponeck
before the UN Panel on Sanctions, they stated that "the two former U.N.
officials are 'not sanctions experts and have narrow expertise in only one
regime.'"
Now isn't THAT odd! They obviously had enough expertise for the US to
support their appointment in the first place. Are we to assume that, by
adding direct experience to that expertise they then became less competent?
Rev. G. Simon Harak, S. J.
- Subject: All the News??
Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 21:08:52 EDT
Fairness and Accuracy In Reportig (FAIR) analysis of New York Times article.
note in particular:
In a December 1998 letter to the London Independent, Michael Stone, the
outgoing chief of the U.N.'s Multidisciplinary Observation Unit wrote
that British officials, like their American counterparts, "frequently state that the Iraqi leadership have diverted supplies under this
[humanitarian] program. This is a serious error. Some 150 international
observers, travelling throughout Iraq, reported to the United Nations
Multidisciplinary Observer Unit, of which I was the head. At no time was
any diversion recorded. I made this clear in our reports to the UN
Secretary General, and he reported in writing to the Security Council
accordingly."
forwarded by Carolyn Scarr
============================
ACTION ALERT: "Paper of Record" Distorts Record on Iraq Sanctions
September 13, 2000
On September 12, the New York Times ran a blatantly biased front-page
article by U.N. correspondent Barbara Crossette about Iraq's decision
not
to allow two teams of United Nations experts into Iraq to assess the
effects of the sanctions. This article is only the latest example of
Crossette's alarming willingness to repeat increasingly shrill-- and
largely discredited-- charges from the U.S. State Department that the
Iraqi government is sabotaging the U.N.'s relief work. (See
http://www.fair.org/extra/0003/crossette-iraq.html )
Throughout the article, Crossette's reporting aims to give the
impression
that Iraq does not allow any outside experts to investigate humanitarian
conditions inside the country. The headline reads, "Iraq Won't Let
Outside Experts Assess Sanctions' Impact on Lives." The lead paragraph
reported, "Iraq will not allow independent experts into the country to
assess the living conditions of Iraqis a decade after economic sanctions
were imposed, Secretary General Kofi Annan told the Security Council
today."
Crossette anonymously quotes "a diplomat" who says, "They claim they
can't get things done, but won't let anybody come in and fix it." She
cites an anonymous "official" as saying that government repression has
"made it almost impossible to work there." An anonymous "European
diplomat" is quoted as saying that there are "fairly solid reports"
that
Iraq is exporting its medicines abroad, with no further evidence given.
Crossette writes that "concern is growing" that "if no independent
collection of information is possible, Iraq can continue to blame
outsiders, particularly the United States, for illnesses and deaths
from disease or malnutrition."
In fact, there are literally hundreds of outside experts in Iraq who
regularly collect such information and have done so for years. They
include officials from the World Health Organization, the World Food
Program, the Food and Agriculture Organization, the United Nations
Development Program,
UNESCO, UNICEF and the United Nations Humanitarian Coordinator's office
in Baghdad. They make thousands of visits each year to water projects,
power plants, farms, warehouses, mills, food distributors, schools,
hospitals, and ordinary homes.
The U.N.'s Baghdad office maintains a 150-person verification team, the
Multidisciplinary Observer Unit, to inspect relief distribution. It also
employs a Swiss auditing company on contract with the United Nations to
verify humanitarian shipments. Not only do the Iraqi ministries
cooperate
with these groups, but the U.N. requires Iraq to *pay* for the operating
expenses of these last two groups out of the proceeds used to buy food
and medicine.
All of this is documented in the very same United Nations briefing that
is the subject of Crossette's article. For example, the briefing
describes
a World Food Program study carried out this summer to investigate Iraq's
system for transporting food. It "found most of the equipment...in a
deplorable state, owing to age, poor maintenance and lack of spare
parts."
The investigators were "encouraged to learn, however, that the
government
of Iraq was already entering into contracts for the gradual replacement"
of the aging equipment.
In July, a World Health Organization team visited an Iraqi medicine
factory. "The observers reported that the plant would require
substantial
investment...to bring it up to international standards." The factory's
Iraqi management "gave assurances that it will cooperate fully with the
United Nations and that observation of its facilities can be carried out
at any time, with or without prior notification," the Secretary General
reported.
Several other examples of Iraq's cooperation with UN humanitarian
workers
were discussed in the report. Yet Crossette's article, based on the same
report, sought to give exactly the opposite impression.
Last year, UNICEF worked with the Iraqi Ministry of Health on a
comprehensive nationwide survey of child and maternal mortality.
Ironically, the study was reported in the New York Times in an article
by
Barbara Crossette (8/13/99). It went unmentioned in yesterday's article.
In a December 1998 letter to the London Independent, Michael Stone, the
outgoing chief of the U.N.'s Multidisciplinary Observation Unit wrote
that British officials, like their American counterparts, "frequently
state that the Iraqi leadership have diverted supplies under this
[humanitarian] program. This is a serious error. Some 150 international
observers, travelling throughout Iraq, reported to the United Nations
Multidisciplinary Observer Unit, of which I was the head. At no time was
any diversion recorded. I made this clear in our reports to the UN
Secretary General, and he reported in writing to the Security Council
accordingly."
Other top United Nations officials have also challenged the assertion
that Iraq interferes in the relief effort. Former U.N. Humanitarian
Coordinator Denis Halliday and his successor, Hans von Sponeck have both
expressed frustration that the U.S. and British governments were putting
out misleading information designed to make it appear that Iraq was
sabotaging the U.N.'s relief work. Crossette has refused to cover their
criticism (Hans von Sponeck, U.N. Press Briefing, 10/26/99; Denis
Halliday, press release, 9/20/99).
Crossette's reporting is astonishingly selective. The Secretary
General's
briefing, which Crossette's article is based on, is a 90-day progress
report that covers all aspects of the oil-for-food program.
Typically, the
Secretary General notes both improvements and problems in the ongoing
program, praising and criticizing the Iraqis as necessary. But Crossette
notes only the criticisms, inflating and distorting them out of all
recognition.
Out of this week's 50-paragraph briefing, Crossette's entire front-page
article is devoted exclusively to paragraphs 11 and 12, which note that
Iraq declined to host the newly proposed teams of experts. She fails to
mention that elsewhere in the briefing, Secretary General Kofi Annan
praised Iraq for improvements in its nutrition program that were made in
response to criticism Annan offered in a briefing last year.
In August 1999, Crossette wrote an entire article about that
two-paragraph
criticism, found in Annan's 104-paragraph briefing, which noted some
flaws
in Iraq's distribution of food supplies. Crossette trumpeted the
comments
as an example of the U.N.'s alleged exasperation with Iraq ("Do More to
Aid Nourishment of Very Young, U.N. Tells Iraq," 8/24/99).
Since then, Iraq has implemented the changes that the Secretary General
recommended. In this week's briefing, Annan praised the government for
having followed his suggestions: "I welcome the decision by the
Government of Iraq to increase considerably the allocations... to
meet the
food, nutrition and health requirements of the population.... [The steps
taken by Iraq] are both welcome and in line with the recommendation
contained in my supplementary report."
The praise went unmentioned in Crossette's September 12 article.
ACTION: Call on the New York Times to publish an editor's note
clarifying
two points: (1) that Iraq has hundreds of outside inspectors and experts
verifying the humanitarian relief programs, contrary to the Times'
front-page September 12 story; and (2) that United Nations humanitarian
officials who dispute the charge that Iraq sabotages the U.N. aid
programs should have been quoted in this story.
As always, please remember that your comments are taken more seriously
if
you maintain a polite tone. Please cc fair@fair.org with your
correspondence.
CONTACT:
Barbara Crossette
Bureau Chief, United Nations
bcrosset@nytimes.com
Joseph Lelyveld
Executive Editor
letters@nytimes.com
To read the original New York Times article:
http://www.fair.org/articles/crossette.html
To read the United Nations report discussed in the New York Times
article, visit: http://www.un.org/Depts/oip/reports/phase890.html
----------
Feel free to respond to FAIR ( fair@fair.org ). We can't reply to
everything, but we will look at each message. We especially appreciate
documented example of media bias or censorship. And please send copies
of
your email correspondence with media outlets, including any
responses, to
us at: fair@fair.org.
FAIR ON THE AIR: FAIR's founder Jeff Cohen is a regular panelist on the
Fox News Channel's "Fox News Watch," which airs Saturdays at 7 pm
and Sundays at 11 am (Eastern Standard Time). Check your local listings.
FAIR produces CounterSpin, a weekly radio show heard on over 120
stations
in the U.S. and Canada. To find the CounterSpin station nearest you,
visit
http://www.fair.org/counterspin/stations.html.
Please support FAIR by subscribing to our bimonthly magazine, Extra!
For more information, go to:
http://www.fair.org/extra/subscribe.html . Or call 1-800-847-3993.
FAIR's INTERNSHIP PROGRAM: FAIR accepts internship applications for its
New York office on a rolling basis. For more information, please e-mail
Peter Hart (phart@fair.org)
You can subscribe to FAIR-L at our web site: http://www.fair.org , or by
sending a "subscribe FAIR-L enter your full name" command to
LISTSERV@AMERICAN.EDU . Our subscriber list is kept confidential.
You may leave the list at any time-- just send a message with "SIGNOFF
FAIR-L" in the body to: LISTSERV@AMERICAN.EDU .
FAIR
(212) 633-6700
http://www.fair.org/
E-mail: fair@fair.org
list administrators: FAIR-L-request@american.edu
Subject: House hearing Wednesday
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2000 14:01:25 EDT
From: EPICalc@aol.com
PLEASE FORWARD
from Carolyn Scarr
-----------00000000-------------
Wednesday, 10:00 a.m., 2172 Rayburn Office Building, Washington DC
the House International Relations Committee is holding a public hearing with
Secretary of State Madeleine Albright testifying.
Although the subject of the hearing is on Russia, Ranking Committee Member
Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney will be asking Secretary Albright to answer
questions regarding the United States military targeting of Iraq water
supplies as described in the recently discovered document IRAQ WATER
TREATMENT VULNERABILITIES, dated 18 January 1991.
Ask your congressperson to attend this hearing. At least to send a high
level staff person. To ask the hard questions about the intentional
destruction of Iraq's water supply by the combine effects of bombing and the
UN sanctions. To call for an end to economic sanctions, to allow Iraq to
rebuild their water system and other essential civilian services.
This is a public hearing. If you live close enough you can attend.
excerpts from IRAQ WATER TREATMENT VULNERABILITIES:
2. WITH NO DOMESTIC SOURCES OF BOTH WATER TREATMENT REPLACEMENT PARTS AND
SOME ESSENTIAL CHEMICALS, IRAO WILL CONTINUE ATTEMPTS TO CIRCUMVENT UNITED
NATIONS SANCTIONS TO IMPORT THESE VITAL COMMODITIES.
3. FAILING TO SECURE SUPPLIES WILL RESULT IN A SHORTAGE OF PURE DRINKING
WATER FOR MUCH OF THE POPULATION. THIS COULD LEAD TO INCREASED INCIDENCES, IF
NOT EPIDEMICS, OF DISEASE. . .
IRAQ HAS MADE A CONSIDERABLE EFFORT TO SUPPLY PURE WATER TO ITS POPULATION. .
. .
11. IRAQ'S RIVERS ALSO CONTAIN BIOLOGICAL MATERIALS, POLLUTANTS, AND ARE
LADEN WITH BACTERIA. UNLESS THE WATER IS PURIFIED WITH CHLORINE EPIDEMICS OF
SUCH DISEASES AS CHOLERA, HEPATITIS, AND TYPHOID COULD OCCUR. . . .
SOME AFFLUENT IRAQIS COULD OBTAIN THEIR OWN MINIMALLY ADEQUATE SUPPLY OF
GOOD OUALITY WATER FROM NORTHERN IRAOI SOURCES. IF BOILED, THE WATER COULD
BE SAFELY CONSUMED. POORER IRAQIS AND INDUSTRIES REQUIRING LARGE OUANTITIES
OF PURE WATER WOULD NOT BE ABLE TO MEET THEIR NEEDS. . . .
FULL DEGRADATION OF THE WATER TREATMENT SYSTEM PROBABLY WILL TAKE AT LEAST
ANOTHER 6 MONTHS. (misspellings in original)
- Subject: January, 2001 Congressional Delegation to Iraq
Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2000 03:17:02 EDT
Backlink to: TownCrier posting
Endorsement Lettter:
The Justice Promoters of the Dominican Order* in North America, their Iraq
Coordinating Committee and the Executive Committee of the Dominican
Leadership Conference invite religiously affiliated organizations and
congregations to endorse and support a Congressional delegation to Iraq
(January 3-11). The delegation offers a unique opportunity to reconsider
United States support for comprehensive sanctions against Iraq.
According to numerous United Nations and independent studies, sanctions have
caused economic collapse, poverty, hunger and disease throughout Iraq,
resulting in the deaths of well over 500,000 children. In recent years, the
two highest-ranking U.N. humanitarian officials in Iraq have resigned in
protest, arguing that stop-gap measures like the food-for-oil deal do little
to slow the senseless and avoidable suffering of innocent civilians. As the
primary architects of the sanctions policy, we in the United States cannot
simply accuse Iraqi leaders and wash our own hands of responsibility. Every
day of continued political stalemate, children die.
In a letter to President Clinton, twenty-four American Christian religious
leaders stated "we have long been deeply concerned by clear evidence that the
embargo against Iraq is contributing to falling living standards and life
expectancy. By almost every measure - - such as malnutrition, child mortality
and overall morbidity - - the situation of most Iraqi civilians has
deteriorated markedly...Whatever the cause, whoever the adversary, we cannot
tolerate the suffering and death of countless innocents...It is time for
fresh thinking and new approaches."
A recent Dear Colleague letter to House Speaker J. Dennis Hastert stated, "In
the United Nations and the United States, the sanctions policy has become
mired in controversy. We want to move beyond this nine-year stalemate and
explore options for what can be done now to ensure peace and security in the
region without exacting a devastating humanitarian toll on innocent
people...The Congress would certainly benefit from a review of the sanctions,
as well as the political, social and economic situation in Iraq."
The Congressional delegation comes at an auspicious time - after ten years of
war and sanctions, on the eve of a new Presidential administration, and at
the end of a Jubilee year (every 50 years) in which we are urged to "raise up
the former devastations [and] repair the ruined cities (Isaiah 61)." There
have been political delegations to Iraq from Europe and other countries, yet
this would be the first high-level visit by U.S. policy-makers. In the
spirit of justice and compassion, we strongly support this step towards
dialogue and peace-making.
Travel related expenses for members of Congress will be covered through
donations. Depending on response from members of Congress, the organizers
may need to solicit contributions. Your endorsement does NOT obligate a
financial contribution.
For more information contact: Rick McDowell Tel: (978) 544-9021 e-mail:
rjpmcd@aol.com
* The Dominicans are a Roman Catholic Order of women and men in existence
since the 13th century and have a significant presence in Iraq. Since 1998,
two North American Dominican delegations have traveled to Iraq.
Endorsements (in process)
Dominican Leadership Conference
Bishop Joseph A. Fiorenza, Bishop of Galveston-Houston
John H. Thomas, General Minister and President, United Church of Christ
American Friends Service Committee
Mennonite Cental Committee
Pax Christi, USA
Fellowship of Reconciliation, USA
Mary Mollison, CSA, President, Leadership Conference of Women Religious.
Stephen Glodek, SM, President, Major Superiors of Men
Provincial Council of the Chicago Province of the School Sisters of Notre Dame
Dominican Sisters of Springfield, IL
Sisters of Charity, BVM, Dubuque, Iowa, Leadership Team
Chicago Regional Leadership Team, Sisters of Mercy of the Americas
Maryknoll Office of Global Concerns
Rev. Daniel J Fox, OFM Cap, Provincial, Detroit Province of Capuchins
Sisters of St. Joseph, Third Order of St. Francis Central Board
Rev. Evan Eckhoff, O.F.M., Order of Friars Minor Provincial, Sacred Heart Province
8th Day Center for Justice, Chicago
Bishop Thomas Gumbleton, Detroit
DanielB.Zwickel@PeaceHost.net, Pacifist Nation
Back to the
Directory